{"id":26,"date":"2005-12-10T19:18:29","date_gmt":"2005-12-10T19:18:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ljudmila.org\/~savskib\/?p=26"},"modified":"2024-12-30T16:35:57","modified_gmt":"2024-12-30T14:35:57","slug":"plesalec","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.turborebop.net\/?p=26","title":{"rendered":"Plesalec"},"content":{"rendered":"

[Original at http:\/\/www.3via.org\/index.php?htm=plesalec\/index<\/a>
\nalso at https:\/\/www.turborebop.net\/html.php?htm=plesalec\/index<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Borut Savski – tretja od treh miniatur iz serije Zvok kot metafora<\/a><\/p>\n

Borut Savski – third of three miniatures from the series Sound as Metaphore<\/a><\/p>\n

Dancer \/ Plesalec<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dancer was presented at Kapelica Gallery\/ Ljubljana on 17th of February, after a delay of a week,\u00a0when an uncontrollable rotation tear out the object’s guts.<\/p>\n

One comment though: It came to my mind that the description of the object\u00a0as\u00a0“robot” was not originally mine. It was also called “android”, which is little better denotation, since it alludes that a moving object is a metaphore of human. This is the most precise term: a moving object as a metaphore. Why not robot or android? Because these terms define the functionality of machine. I caught myself thinking at one moment that the thing should really see the surroundings and be able to decide intelligently. But this is going too far…<\/p>\n

Prezgodnji porod? A prematurely born … was born …<\/p>\n

\"foto<\/p>\n

This photo by Miha Fras\u00a0accompanied the article on the “one of the most poor performances”\u00a0of machines that ever happened at Kapelica Gallery. Written by Ja\u0161a Kramar\u0161i\u010d at Mladina<\/a>. His is also the thesis that “object should be able to speak on it’s own…”<\/p>\n

\"\"“… nothing is easy” is a citation from a movie by Pedro Almodovar, when Pina Bausch performs one of her very special moves … and it’s coming to my mind often lately …<\/p>\n

Problems? Yes… always…<\/p>\n

The robot must be\u00a0perfectly stable on it’s own (now OK), a better speed control added (OK, done), lowering of the weight (Litium instead of\u00a0 Pb accus – done, YES…). Apart from disbalance control (for changing the direction) also some form of selfbalance control must be added. Disbalancing must have priority over the self-balancing until some moment, then the two must change priorities.<\/p>\n

sound excerpts… mp3s:<\/p>\nhttps:\/\/www.turborebop.net\/plesalec\/snd\/Dancer1s.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\nhttps:\/\/www.turborebop.net\/plesalec\/snd\/Dancer1l.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n

After the installation a group of four ( Boreut Savski, Matja\u017e Man\u010dek, Luka Prin\u010di\u010d and Petra Tihole) performed an improvisational session, that came out well, so you can listen to it ALL here…<\/a>\u00a0(over 50 minutes)<\/p>\nhttp:\/\/kruljo.radiostudent.si\/mp3\/muzika\/Turboslav\/savski_mancek_potiho_nova.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The poetic idea of human self-balancing vith a view of “wholeness” linked with the\u00a0(human) concept of time which openes the space for many questions of motive and motion …
\nA dancer – balancing on the tips of her toes. A classical ballet\u00a0ideal – the art of balancing.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

A physical model\u00a0 of\u00a0dynamically self-balancing\u00a0system – known as\u00a0gyro. The spin keeps it balanced and the slope makes it moving …\u00a0It’s main property is precession – when it turns fast it is able to balance on its pivot. The spinning\u00a0 mass presents an inertia to any turning. This force is called precession.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Human psyche is\u00a0a self-balancing system. The absolute is (always)\u00a0just around the corner … A clock – a symbol of\u00a0(linear) time. The\u00a0subjectivity is a projection\u00a0forward & backward in time…\u00a0A clock centered on the nose gives a funny clown-like look. A comment?<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

First object (alpha) was unable to spin on its own, because of the weight of lead accumulators. The frame was not\u00a0very well\u00a0 balanced … a prematurely born …<\/p>\n

The second version (beta) is lighter, smaller and stronger but it still has problems on rougher grounds. The neccessary financial injection to upgrade was almost too much …<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

It is fitted with a tail (as seen on the right). Tail helps to keep the upper part relatively fixed, so that all the spin is transferred to the lower part.\u00a0It still doesn’t have a sound sensitive counterbalance to change direction (now the tail helps).\u00a0The batteries and the rough grounds allow for about 15 minutes of “autonomy” …<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The next (last?) version will be “production version” with a\u00a0nickname Rudi (-> Rudolf Nurejev, of course…). I’ll fix\u00a0some kind of colorful panties for\u00a0it.<\/p>\n

The tail will eventually have to get off, if any kind of “subjectivity” is to emerge (I think). Humans balance themselves with abstract counterweights – not with tail …<\/p>\n

PLESALEC\/ PLESALKA<\/strong><\/p>\n

Plesalec je avtonomen gibljiv objekt, ki se \u017eeli predstaviti kot umetni\u0161ki subjekt.\u00a0 Deluje na principu plesa\/ pomikanja skozi zvo\u010dno polje v prostoru. Njegov\u00a0komunikacijski kanal (-> vi\u0161ji smisel; motiv) je torej zvok, ki ga vodi sem ter tja po prostoru. A ker gre \u017ee za abstrakcijo (primarni motiv je gibanje; posledi\u010dni motiv, ki ga \u017eelimo,\u00a0pa je zvok – vmes je neka to\u010dka potujitve, ki pa jo dolo\u010dimo\/ osmislimo\u00a0ljudje). \u0160ele ko se neposredno razumevanje vzrokov (vi\u0161jega) gibanja (-> tokrat zvok) zabri\u0161e – torej se samo gibanje kot neposredni (\u010deprav nelinearni – ne neposredno\u00a0soodvisen\/soodgovoren) vzrok umakne v ozadje –\u00a0objekt “za\u017eivi”\u00a0samostojno \u017eivljenje.<\/p>\n

S\u00a0procesom pozabe (prvotnih) razlogov se torej\u00a0vzpostavi (novo) razumevanje.\u00a0Razlog je v spremembi\u00a0sistema vrednotenja, vendar meja\u00a0v na\u0161em primeru ni popolnoma zabrisana. Tako gibanje kot zvok ostajata prisotna. \u010ce pa bi se gibanje izostalo (recimo pri poslu\u0161anju le zvo\u010dnega zapisa), pa bi popolnoma pre\u0161li v drug vrednostni sistem.<\/p>\n

Ta na\u010din nastajanja in osamosvajanja miselnih teles je enak kot pri mitih. Mit je miselno telo, ki se je (pomensko) osamosvojilo (postalo verjetno – torej resni\u010dno) s tem ko je\u00a0izgubilo svoje vzro\u010dne\u00a0povezave. Mit ne potrebuje posebnega procesa razumevanja – kot nosilec pomena je neposredno razumljiv. Pri mitu so vzroki zabrisani. \u010ce bi jih znova prepoznali, bi mit razpadel. Temu pravimo demistifikacija.<\/p>\n

Plesalec vpliva na zvo\u010dno polje tudi povratno – vsak trenutek ga torej spreminja. Hipnim spremembam pa se upirajo posamezni deli tega sklopljenega sistema (objekt in prostor po katerem se giblje). To imenujemo inercije in so posledica fizi\u010dnih lastnosti, ki se na spremembe ne morejo odzvati hipno.<\/p>\n

Seveda gre tudi tokrat za metafori\u010dno postavitev. Bistveno vpra\u0161anje, ki si ga postavljam je, ali ni morda \u010dloveku subjektivnost dosegljiva zaradi gibanja (v splo\u0161nem: dinamike) in ne (le) zaradi jezika?<\/p>\n

gibanje -> motiv (-> gibalo)<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Neka okrevanka je po hudi nesre\u010di, po kateri je do\u017eivela popolno amnezijo, povedala, da je imela najve\u010d te\u017eav s ponovno priu\u010ditvijo ravnote\u017eja – hoje. Zastavljeno vpra\u0161anje postane bolj verjetno, \u010de fizi\u010dno uravnove\u0161anje raz\u0161irimo\u00a0\u0161e na psiholo\u0161ko, nad katerim pa imamo v vsakodnevnem nizanju trenutkov precej manj mo\u010di.<\/p>\n

Razcep, v psihoanalizi poimenovan\u00a0 manko, onemogo\u010da stati\u010dno stabilno stanje (-> trajno sre\u010do, trajno nesre\u010do). Ali pa ni morda prav ta razcep motor, generator sprememb? V takem primeru so tudi odlo\u010ditve (racionalizirane spremembe) lahko dokaj poljubne (odvisne od inercij – tudi in predvsem psiholo\u0161kih – vsakega individualnega sistema).<\/p>\n

\u0160e o racionalizaciji:
\n<\/strong>
\nBesedo racionalizacija uporabljamo, ker gre praviloma vedno za osmi\u0161ljanje za nazaj (tudi v naprej), Torej je za to opravilo nujno potrebna kategorija \u010dasovna premica, ki odpre prostor vzro\u010dnosti in posledi\u010dnosti. To se zdi\u00a0primarna \u010dlovekova domena.<\/p>\n

Vpra\u0161anje Plesalca je torej lovljenje dinami\u010dnega ravnovesja – najbr\u017e ni izklju\u010deno tudi padanje. Plesalec lovi ravnovesje na na\u010din vrtavke, za spreminjanje smeri plesa pa mu pomaga spreminjanje polo\u017eaja te\u017ei\u0161\u010dnice od ravnovesne lege. Za relativno mirovanje te\u017ei\u0161\u010dnice skrbi giroskop – nujno potrebni (inercijski) element. Uspe\u0161nost lovljenja ravnote\u017eja je potreben pogoj za nastanek zvo\u010dne kompozicije.<\/p>\n

Borut Savski<\/a><\/p>\n

Plesalec\/ Dancer was produced by Kapelica Gallery<\/a> with the help of Ministry of Culture of Slovenia and City of Ljubljana.
\nPlesalec\/ Dancer is a part of the Sound as Metaphore<\/a> series of\u00a0projects by the same author<\/a>. Read more about\u00a0Trivia<\/a> projects.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[Original at http:\/\/www.3via.org\/index.php?htm=plesalec\/index also at https:\/\/www.turborebop.net\/html.php?htm=plesalec\/index] Borut Savski – tretja od treh miniatur iz serije Zvok kot metafora Borut Savski – third of three miniatures from the series Sound as Metaphore Dancer \/ Plesalec Dancer was presented at Kapelica Gallery\/ Ljubljana on 17th of February, after a delay of a week,\u00a0when an uncontrollable rotation tear […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1604,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,2],"tags":[19,17,18],"class_list":["post-26","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-archive","category-arts","tag-concepts-2","tag-objects","tag-situations-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turborebop.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turborebop.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turborebop.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turborebop.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turborebop.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=26"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.turborebop.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2285,"href":"https:\/\/www.turborebop.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26\/revisions\/2285"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turborebop.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turborebop.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=26"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turborebop.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=26"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turborebop.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=26"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}